Article
|
Olympic-Sized Fire Protection
Public safety officials
consulted NFPA standards when planning fire protection for the Salt
Lake City Winter Games.
The
following article appeared in the January/February 2002 issue of NFPA
Journal. Reprinted with permission.
© 2002 NFPA Journal
The 2002 Winter Olympics, which will be held in
Salt Lake City, Utah, from February 8 to 24, is the biggest Winter
Olympiad ever with 3,500 athletes representing 80 countries and the
safest, if Olympic officials have anything to say about it. Given
recent world events, this is no small undertaking, especially for fire
safety and emergency response.
Past Olympics have been marred by terrorist
attacks, so the problem was uppermost in many of the organizers’
minds. In 1972, terrorists stormed the Olympic Village during the
Summer Games in Munich, Germany, and took nine Israeli athletes
hostage. All the hostages and five of the terrorists died. And in 1996,
a pipe bomb exploded in Centennial Park during the Summer Olympics in
Atlanta, Georgia, killing one person and injuring 110.
After the Atlanta Games, President Clinton
issued a directive establishing a national procedure to provide public
safety for National Security Special Events, such as the Olympics. The
designation “National Security Special Event” gives the U.S. Secret
Service the lead in planning for public safety on site, the Federal
Bureau of Investigation (FBI) the task of gathering intelligence and
planning an appropriate federal response to threats, and the Federal
Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) the lead in consequence management.
The state of Utah and Salt Lake City will also share in
counter-terrorism planning, using federal planning grants that come
with the designation.
Even before the September 11 attacks, the
groundwork for the Olympic safety program was being laid, and extensive
training in terrorism awareness was one of the first topics discussed.
The original plan was extensive and comprehensive. Nevertheless,
following the events of September 11, the Utah Olympic Public Safety
Command decided to put in place several enhancements. These include
extraordinary measures for combating an airplane threat, more
restrictive policies and procedures to gain entry to a venue, and
higher levels of security at certain non-competition sites, among other
provisions.
“The Federal Emergency Management Agency has
been providing a lot of support, as have the ATF (Bureau of Alcohol,
Tobacco, and Firearms), the FBI, and others concerned about terrorism
in the Olympics even before the events of September 11,” says Dan
Andrus, fire marshal for the Salt Lake City Fire Department.
According to Scott Adams, fire marshal for the
Park City Fire Service District, there was no need to make any
significant changes in the fire protection program to incorporate
provisions pertaining to terrorism because terrorism had already been
considered when designing and preparing for the Olympics.
“Before September 11, we’d been getting
anti-terrorism training for two years through the Utah Olympic Public
Safety Command,” he says.
In addition, 1,900 Utah National Guard members
will be activated to help with security at the Winter Olympics. By the
time the games arrive, virtually every Guard member will be on duty and
the Utah Guard will get assistance from 1,200 Guard members from 13
states.
The Guard troops will have three main missions:
screening vehicles and visitors at Olympic venues, standing perimeter
guard duty at the venues, and providing a rapid deployment force in the
event of a crisis.
Planning problems addressed
A distinct benefit of the Olympic planning
process was the formation of the Fire Marshal’s Working Group, which
brought the 15 fire marshals responsible for public safety operations
in the Salt Lake City area together, says Adams.
Among the many challenges they faced was how to
protect the 10 different venues on and around the University of Utah
campus, where some of the Olympic events will be held. Fortunately,
that obstacle was overcome by cooperation and planning.
The members of the working group were given
specific areas to work on to develop a uniform set of regulations,
governing everything from fire access roads and temporary structures to
the use of propane gas.
“We started meeting in 1999, and one of our
first tasks was to develop a uniform set of regulations,” says
Andrus. “Over a period of several months, we developed a fire
inspector’s guide that dealt with temporary structures in the arena,
such as tents and canopies.”
A variety of approaches was envisioned.
“We required specialized fire protection
systems in the (largest) tents,” says Andrus. “In one tent that was
20,000 square feet (1,858 square meters), we required a fire alarm and
a sprinkler system.”
Mike Halligan, fire marshal for the University
of Utah, was responsible for the section of the guide devoted to tents
and temporary structures.
“I looked at NFPA 101®, Life Safety Code®,
and building and fire codes, then wrote down two pages of information
that the designers needed to know,” Halligan says. “If the
designers couldn’t possibly meet the requirements, they knew it early
on, and this was where they had to talk to me or my peers.
“We also spent a lot of time on propane
because there was no natural gas (in the venue areas),” he says.
“We wrote up that section using NFPA 58, Liquefied Petroleum Gas
Code, in a format that a designer could get to quickly.”
Among the other NFPA documents the working group
used were NFPA 102, Grandstands, Folding and Telescopic Seating, Tents
and Membrane Structures; NFPA 13, Installation of Sprinkler Systems;
NFPA 72, National Fire Alarm Code®, and NFPA 70, National Electrical
Code®.
Structural challenges
As for structural protection challenges, the
main media center was of special concern for safety officials. For the
first time in Olympic history, a single organization, International
Sports Broadcasting Utah, will produce all the television and radio
broadcasts of the Games and provide the broadcasters with content.
Because revenues are tied to broadcasts, it’s
vital to have a media center operating without interruption.
“The media center was challenging,” says
Andrus, “because of the fuel load, the wiring, and the generators.”
It’s estimated that 32,000 miles (51,499 kilometers) of optical fiber
cable will be used in covering the Games.
To protect the Athletes’ Village, the Salt
Lake City Fire Department erected a temporary fire station that
provides 24-hour fire protection and emergency medical service. Several
engine companies outside the venue will be designated to respond and
will be used exclusively for the Olympic venue.
The Athletes’ Village includes 23 student
residence halls the University of Utah built two years ago with the
Olympics in mind. They’re fully sprinklered and equipped with fire
alarm systems. However, some special considerations also had to be
made.
“The students’ living rooms will become
bedrooms for the athletes,” says Halligan. “We had to design the
location of the smoke detectors and sprinkler heads to account for
this. Small things, but they can have a big impact.
“The biggest challenge was working to get a
lot done in a short time,” he adds. “On a normal construction
project, you have time to meet with the architect, lay out plans, and
work through the design process. That isn’t always the case with the
Olympics. You have time to discuss things on a general basis, but you
have such a short time to design the venue and get it built.”
Halligan uses the university’s 46,000-seat
Rice-Eccles Stadium as an example. It was built three years ago but
underwent major modifications to provide an additional 10,000 seats for
the Games. In addition, Olympic organizers had to provide support
structures around the stadium for broadcast crews, security personnel,
athletes, and others.
“Literally, you had to build a city around the
structure,” says Halligan.
The fire safety planning process started three
years ago when Olympic management met with Halligan. This process gave
him an opportunity to outline how the University of Utah approaches
fire safety and offer the university’s fire protection staff as a
resource for the organizers. When the engineers and architects started
arriving, university officials met with them to outline their fire
safety concerns, says Halligan.
“It became a partnership. Even though we
weren’t listed on the design team, they worked with us to ensure that
the code requirements were incorporated into the design of the
Athletes’ Village,” he says.
To accommodate the influx of people, a number of
temporary structures were erected on the campus. Among these are two
7,500-square-foot (697-square-meter) tents, attached to existing
buildings, that serve as dining halls. Cold and dry storage trailers
were attached to the tents.
“This brings up a whole new set of issues,”
says Halligan. “Creativity is the name of the game.”
For example, the only place a temporary kitchen
on a raised floor could be positioned was directly over a fire hydrant.
To overcome this problem, hoses were run from the hydrant to the
perimeter of the kitchen, where removable panels provided access to the
hydrant.
To protect the main dining facility, fire alarm
systems with pull stations and audible and visual alerting devices were
installed.
A 6,000-square-foot (557-square-meter) warehouse
that was converted into a nightclub was protected with a sprinkler
system, as well as a fire alarm system.
The importance of inspections
Safety inspections during the days leading up to
the Olympics are critical to ensure that the protection provisions the
planners specified are met. For example, the grandstands were supposed
to be made of non-combustible materials. When they arrived, however,
the supporting structure was found to be combustible.
“They held 12,000 people, and in some places,
they were 100 to 150 feet (30 to 46 meters) in the air and hanging off
cliffs and mountains,” says Adams. If they’d caught fire, hundreds,
if not thousands, of lives could’ve been lost.
To solve the problem, a deluge system was
installed under the grandstands, and a person monitoring the event will
be at the valve.
Inspections were planned for before and during
the Olympics, says Halligan.
“Starting in mid-December at the stadium and
the village, a new occupancy permit was issued for each trailer and
tent they brought in. Once they’re occupied, they’ll have
inspectors in the villages 24 hours a day doing spot checks.”
Another concern was the water supply. In the
areas of the grandstands, the commentary cabins, and the skiers’
waxing huts, there was none. As a solution, the working group suggested
using the snow-making water system. Since that system ran at 200 to 600
psi (14 to 41 bars), however, pressure reducers similar to those used
in high-rise buildings were installed.
The fireworks planned for the opening ceremonies
presented another problem. The stadium is landlocked, without a lot of
space around it, so placing launch sites and routing people safely took
some thought. Officials used local Fourth of July celebrations as an
opportunity to determine what the best solutions were. Some of these
included identifying satellite locations for shooting off fireworks and
developing spectator traffic patterns that wouldn’t expose them to
falling debris.
The pyrotechnics for the opening ceremonies will
be performed in accordance with NFPA 1124, Manufacture, Transportation,
and Storage of Pyrotechnic Articles; NFPA 1123, Fireworks Displays; and
NFPA 1126, Pyrotechnics Before an Proximate Audience.
Since it’s winter, snow was also a concern.
“You don’t normally think of a snow
management plan as an important issue of fire access, but it is,”
says Halligan. “Where they put the snow is important. You can’t
block fire access or put it at the end of the lane.”
Officials had to identify a method of removing
snow that didn’t infringe on the fire safety set-up.
Another area of concern, according to Andrus,
was the rest of the city.
“Overcrowding in nighttime recreation
facilities, lots of temporary ‘mom and pop’ structures where people
were selling things—we had to deal with all these,” he says.
Three of the Games’ venues are in Park City,
about 30 miles from Salt Lake City. In addition to the daytime crowds
at events, there will be hundreds of people visiting the city’s many
restaurants and nightclubs.
“We were getting fire prevention people from
across the United States to augment the Park City staffing,” says
Adams, including 20 volunteers assigned to Park City, and another 10 at
other venues in the area.
While each Olympics is unique, organizers
often learn the best safety procedures from previous Games.
“Representatives from Salt Lake City went to
Atlanta, Japan, and Sydney to learn what they did right and what they
could’ve done better,” Halligan says. “This helps you to get off
the starting block a few yards ahead of everyone else.”
Sydney Olympics
Safety and security preparations for the 2000
Summer Games in Sydney, Australia, a massive undertaking involving many
agencies from New South Wales, began shortly after the International
Olympic Organization awarded Sydney the Games in 1993.
“There were a lot of meetings from the word
go,” says John Honeybrook, the manager of the Fire Safety Division
for the New South Wales Fire Brigade (NSWFB). “This was the best
process I’ve been involved with. Usually, people come to us too late
(in typical building projects). This time, we were involved early and
got problems resolved.”
In 1995, the NSWFB formed a committee to examine
the fire protection aspects of the Games. However, it quickly grew in
size, becoming less effective, and it was scaled back. John Spiteri, an
NSWFB zone commander, was appointed program manager. The NSWFB’s
responsibility for fire protection for the entire state of New South
Wales proved a distinct advantage in the planning and preparation
because organizers were able to use a uniform approach.
It was clear that a safe Olympics was
everyone’s goal and to reach it, several strategies were employed.
For example, the performance-based Building Code of Australia was used
extensively in the planning process.
Safety officials also used advice found in
“The Book.” After each Olympics, a document outlining what was done
is passed on to the next host city to provide them with some guidance.
Until the 2000 Olympics, fire safety wasn’t included. “Fire is now
in ‘The Book,’ ” says Brett Hume, NSWFB assistant commissioner.
“The Book” now details the brigade’s
experiences in planning for fire protection, as well as the problems
encountered during the Games.
Another of Hume’s strategies was to solicit
support, rather than mandate it.
“Early in the process, we met with venue
managers and gave them a motivational talk about fire, using the
Bradford soccer stadium as an example,” he says. In 1985, 56 people
died and more than 200 were injured when fire engulfed the main stand
at Valley Parade Soccer Stadium in Bradford, England.
The meeting was a turning point and had a
positive influence on the process. However, there were instances in
which Hume had to mandate action.
The main stadium in which the opening and
closing ceremonies were held contained a number of oversized
compartments designed to limit the spread of smoke and fire. As a
cost-cutting measure, the compartment doors hadn’t been equipped with
magnetic hold-open devices, so they were always closed. As a result,
fork-lift trucks and other equipment were constantly banging into them
and damaging them.
One week before a football game was scheduled to
be played in the stadium, NSWFB threatened to shut down the facility
unless the doors were repaired. More than $100,000 (Australian) later,
the doors were equipped with magnetic hold-opens interconnected with
the fire alarm system.
“This made it known that during the Olympics,
we would invoke the orders if necessary,” says Hume.
Uninterrupted transmission
Like their counterparts at the Salt Lake City
Games, Sydney organizers were keenly aware of the financial impact of a
fire.
“It’s estimated that it cost $500,000 per
minute for television rights,” says Hume. “That was one of the big
concerns: not interrupting the television transmission.”
Providing transmission and production facilities
for the Sydney Games was a staggering undertaking. Each television
station needed production facilities where the day’s tapes could be
reviewed, edited, and transmitted to its home country. In addition,
broadcast facilities were needed for the on-air talent.
To meet these needs, the Royal Agricultural Show
building was converted into the Sydney Media Center. Inside the
107,642-square-foot (10,000-square-meter) building a temporary wooden
floor 3 feet (1 meter) high was constructed, and plywood dividers were
installed to provide separate work areas.
Fire protection devices in this unique
environment included thermal heat detection, as well as hose reels, and
teams of firefighters stationed in the building.
“I’m unaware of any other instance where
firefighters have been a part of the performance-based solution,”
says Hume.
Another area of great concern was the
323,000-square-foot (30,000-square-meter) International Broadcast
Center (IBC). Journalists from 200 countries were under pressure to get
the broadcasts done in a timely manner, the building was equipped with
broadcast studios, a 600-seat food court, a 200-seat restaurant, a
medical center, a money exchange center, post office shipping offices,
a souvenir shop, and other administrative offices.
Fire protection for the IBC was a challenge
because of the ceiling height and the large fuel load inside the
building.
“Consequently, fire protection centered around
the ability of the occupants being given sufficient time to evacuate
before conditions became untenable,” says NSWFB Inspector Chris
Shapter.
To achieve this goal, internal, one-hour fire
rated walls provided egress routes and the internal ceilings were
designed to collapse, allowing smoke to escape upward toward the high,
open ceiling. All areas were equipped with smoke detection devices
supervised by a station commander and three firefighters.
If a smoke detector activated, it transmitted a
signal to the central location and to the NSWFB communications center.
The firefighters stationed in the IBC responded on a specially equipped
golf cart to investigate the alarm and begin operations if needed.
A key fire safety component for all the Sydney
venues was the daily inspection of each facility. Inspectors involved
in the safety planning and preparation were assigned to inspect the
facilities because they were already familiar with them. Problems were
quickly identified and corrected, a critical factor in keeping the
facilities safe.
Just one aspect
Of course, managing the fire prevention program
was only one part of the NSWFB’s job at the Games. The operational
side of the fire brigade did a lot of preparation and planning, too.
Security issues made it important to define how
apparatus and personnel would get into the venues if an incident
occurred. To help streamline access, emergency response vehicles were
allowed to use the Olympic Routes reserved for transporting athletes
between venues.
“We planned for a lot of bottlenecks on the
roads,” says NSWFB Superintendent John Bowles, “but there was no
traffic to deal with, much to everyone’s surprise. There was no
school, and the government had encouraged people to take vacations.”
In some areas, using special routes wasn’t
enough. The only effective way to get apparatus and personnel into
certain venues was to position them inside it. In other venues,
specialized carts equipped with firefighting equipment had to be
substituted for standard fire apparatus, which were too big to get
where they needed to go.
The firefighters themselves operated out of four
identical, specially built fire stations and rotated among the stations
and the venues.
Training exercises
To prepare firefighters for their Olympic
duties, four training exercises were held.
“The closer we got to the Olympics, the more
complex the exercises became,” says Hume. “The plans were simple.
We didn’t change existing procedures. They were value-added and
consistent with our existing procedures.”
Designated Alpha, Bravo, Charlie, and Delta, the
exercises were designed to test different aspects of response
operations.
The first two were tabletop exercises. Exercise
Alpha, held in April 2000, involved a ferry fire in Sydney Harbor,
while Exercise Bravo, held in June 2000, simulated a fire in the lower
level of the Olympic Stadium.
In August 2000, Exercise Charlie simulated the
release of an unknown substance that overcame emergency response
personnel. This was designed to test the combined operations of a
number of agencies, including the NSWFB, the military, and law
enforcement agencies.
Exercise Delta simulated a large-scale incident
involving hazardous materials and an explosive device. This exercise
was designed to test the system’s ability to coordinate the
activities of a number of organizations and to fine-tune the operations
of the Major Incident Coordination Center (MICC) and other operations
centers. During the Olympics, one officer stood by in the MICC to put
it into operation if needed.
In addition to the exercises, the evaluation
process included a quality-control check by another Australian fire
brigade, which reviewed the fire prevention and operational plans. Very
little had to be changed, says Hume.
The extensive and detailed preparation resulted
in a successful Summer Olympics. The NSWFB responded to only 143
incidents, none of them major, and only 126 rectification notices were
issued during the daily inspections, most for relatively minor
violations.
Before the recent spate of anthrax attacks in
the United States, Olympic organizers had already begun planning their
response to bioterrorism. They asked the Commissioned Corps Readiness
Force (CCRF), a cadre of U.S. Public Health Service officers uniquely
qualified by education and skills, to provide four five-person medical
strike teams to cover venue events during the Games. These officers
will be positioned in a variety of locations so they can respond
quickly to a bioterrorist attack.
Sidebar
The Olympics organizers also reserved the right
to request additional Public Health Service officers for other
deployment roles as the event draws closer.
Salt Lake City’s bioterrorism response plans
were further bolstered in November 2000, when the U.S. Department of
Energy’s Center for the Study of Bioterrorism and Emerging Infections
held a tabletop exercise called “Black Ice” in the city. This
exercise was the first in a series of activities designed by the Office
of Critical Infrastructure Protection to help ensure the reliability
and security of the energy, telecommunications, transportation, water,
banking, and financial systems in critical infrastructures before,
during, and after a major public event, as well as the continued
support of emergency and government services. More than 200
representatives of 65 federal, state, and local agencies participated.
Ed Comeau is the
principal writer for writer-tech.com, a technical writing firm.
He was previously the chief fire investigator for NFPA, and a
fire protection engineer for the Phoenix Fire Department.
|
|